Inappropriate behavior by former Foreign Ministry Director General at UN sponsored anti-Israel conference
In response to my last column titled Confronting Jews who defame Jews, one of my readers sent me official United Nations summaries of a conference held this month in Malta “in support of Israeli-Palestinian peace” under the joint auspices of the UN created “Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People” and the “Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean”. Israel understandably decided not to participate officially.
In Israel’s absence, Hebrew University lecturer, Alon Liel, was the sole Israeli participant. Liel who was in the news last year as an apologist for Syria’s Assad, was for a short period in 2000 Director General of the Foreign Ministry under Prime Minister Ehud Barak. He was also a former Ambassador to South Africa.
As a former Director General of the Foreign Ministry, I consider Liel’s remarks at this conference to be unconscionable especially having regard to the fact that the gathering comprised almost exclusively of representatives utterly hostile to Israel.
Here are a few choice extracts from the UN official release of Liel’s contribution to the debate.
Mr. Liel said that everything Mr. Erakat said was true. It looked like the Palestinians had nothing and the Israelis had everything, but Israelis knew they were doomed, too, and dependent on the fate of the Palestinians, he said, adding, “If you will have nothing in the future, we will also have nothing in the future.” But at the moment, Israelis did not have that feeling, and they were overconfident….
“We don’t have a Mandela in Israel; we have a Netanyahu and a Lieberman,” and unless something dramatic happened, things would not work, he lamented.
As for the situation on the ground, Liel said it was unacceptable, both in Gaza and the West Bank. In fact, it was immoral and would only lead to more violence. At the same time, for Israel, the creation of one State with Palestinians - where they had voting rights and so forth - was an even bigger nightmare than the two-state solution. So he proffered to the conference that perhaps the Palestinians should propose that to the Israeli leadership today, adding: “They’ll start shivering, I’m telling you.”
Not surprisingly, the PLO representative, Saeb Erakat praised Liel’s comments as “transparent and honest” and “reflecting the facts as they are”. A representative of parliamentarians of Western Europe also commended Liel’s “bleak picture of Foreign Minister Lieberman and Israeli intransigence”.
Liel’s remarks compared to some of the more obscene outbursts by Israeli demonizers of Zion may appear relatively tame. But what makes this outrageous, is the fact that Liel was a former Director General of the Foreign Ministry and the only Israeli present amongst a gathering dominated by the Arab League and comprising exclusively of representatives hostile to Israel.
On a more positive note, I have just been informed that a group of members of the Board of Governors of the Tel Aviv University, including major donors, have threatened to withdraw their support and publicly lambast the university administration unless action is taken to bring an end to the exploitation of academic freedom by Tel Aviv university academics calling for the boycott and delegitimization of Israel.
_________________________________________________________________________________
The Tel Aviv University administration has obviously yet to grapple with the problem. The following email invitation is being widely distributed in London.
Palestine Societies at SOAS, University College London , Imperial College ,
Kings College , Goldsmiths and University of Westminster
Together with BRICUP
Invite you to
Supporting the Boycott of Israel : Campaigning from Within
Speaker: Anat Matar, Tel Aviv University
Chair: Mike Cushman, BRICUP and Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods
Wed 17th February 2010 , SOAS G2, 6pm
Anat Matar is a senior lecturer at the department of philosophy, Tel Aviv University . She specializes in 20th century philosophy of language, in particular that of Wittgenstein, Dummett and Derrida. Anat Matar has been politically active for many years. She has taken part in movements resisting the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories , mainly those urging the refusal to serve in the army and the BDS movement. She is a founding member and the chair of The Israeli Association for the Palestinian Prisoners.
Mike Cushman is a member of the Department of Management at LSE where he researches the nature of digital and social exclusion. Mike has been politically active for many years but he has increasingly focused his activities around the area of Palestinian rights. In December 2008 he visited Gaza on the Free Gaza boat ‘Dignity’ on the last successful voyage before the Israeli invasion.




Again, as you wrote above, a self hating Jew has a forum where he can enhance his low self esteem under the imagined cover of “wrongs done by “mine” against “You”… If the world doesn’t return to a measure of sanity, if people do not recover some of the pride we used to have in our own ethnic heritage, and if we continue obsessively believing that forced multiculturalism is the only way to survive our descendants won’t have anything left to be proud of. Tribal and ethnic-group pride has been with us from pre-historic times. There is nothing to be ashamed of because of it. We should accept, honor and understand other cultures, but we do not have to become an integral part of everyone. Our brains aren’t large enough to absorb all cultures around the globe. Diversity it beautiful. If the world become black and white, no more diversity and no more beauty… We must be more humble. We must learn to love and accept our different neighbors without robbing their customs, traditions, or way of life.,Nowhere is it written that we must become exactly like everyone else on this earth. And here follows the reason I say this…If someone is trying to kill me…or my family…or my friends…or even distant relatives, I cannot accept this “other” as a multicultural friend. I will defend and protect my family and fight for their right to survive. Once we start adopting everyone as a “brother” because we “IMAGINE” their right to live in peace…What if the others don’t want to be our brothers? What about our own peace ? … Are we so different that we don’t qualify as part of the multiculturalism? What about the others accepting our “diversity” People imagine some wrongs done to them, and therefore assert their right to harm us and ours…This is all imagined… And terribly wrong. IT IS NOT REAL. Reality Is that ‘LIVE AND LET LIVE” should apply to everyone and must trump any excuse to harm someone else. If certain people in our group sympathize with those who wish to harm us…then they are certainly not on the right path and should be told so. Our institutions should not be afraid to dismiss anyone who betrays his own people, simply because he IMAGINES being empowered by siding with our enemies and beacuse they use that person to harm someone of his tribe…What happened to the word traitor? Not long ago, traitors were meted out very harsh punishmen if they went over to the enemy’s side…Let’s not forget that